![]() |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Again and as always a big thanks to EXC who has given me consent to post this here:
Quote:
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Thanks Tanz, it does sound like no organisation, but still some good points put over, ive never read them before, lets hope its enough.
![]()
__________________
I will not be on the internet after the end of January 2009, so will not be around as much as usuall. Anyone who wants to email me still go ahead but i won't be checking daily, more like weekly up the library. ![]() " the cages we live in are often of our own making" ![]() time for a life style change ![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Sounds to me that it bears out the basic fact that if this case is the best presentation of organisation, the OFT can put forward at this high level only shows the reason for some of the replies members get from the OFT at lower levels, they do not know how to explain things, ie lack of communication skills, and confuse peolpe who complain to them,
but I'm just a thick "sparkie" |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I think we were all hoping for something a little more.......err......dynamic weren't we?
__________________
E-mail addresses are now available to all members at a cost of £5.00 per year. Please PM tamadus for details Please do not be offended if I have to edit out derogatory words or statements from your posts. Sometimes, this is necessary to protect the poster and the site from retaliatory action ![]() |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Yes I agree Bel, it raised a few hot debates over on Beagles.
I think our Quack (I mean Doctor) should have presented his points better than he has to date, however the judge will also need to take into consideration all the other facts of the case so will look at all evidence and docs etc put forward from both sides. This should be where we can prove our point as the RTD and counter claims put forward by th eOFT were actually quite well put together. It was never going to be over until the fat lady sings. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
sparkie |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I had a £30.00 charge in 1998 for using my card whilst above my agreed overdraft. The charge was entitled CARD ABUSE - Would this be a charge for a service.
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Send a copy of it by Special Delivery to Brian Doctor! It looks as though he may need all the help he can get!
![]() ![]() |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Penalty which if added into a spreaddie using todays day and month and 1998, with an interest rate of 27.9% it would be worth around £321.66 if this spreaddie is right lol
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() thats probably not far off Tanz. It's surprising how fast compounded interest adds up.
__________________
Advice & opinions of Tamadus and the Consumer Credit Support Group are offered from personal experience only. They are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Use your own judgment. It is suggested you seek advice from a qualified, insured professional at all times Please consider making a donation to this site (we suggest 5%) from any charges we help you reclaim. consumercreditsupport.co.uk email addresses are now available at a cost of £5 per year. Please PM me for details |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|